Evidence-Based Clinical Question Search Assignment

Purpose:

The purpose of this Assignment is to give you a practical application to implement your PICOT idea, supported by the evidence-based research you have obtained in during your systematic review. You will apply evidence-based research findings, discovered from your clinical question, and then integrate those to support your suggested change in nursing practice.

Directions:

  1. Identify your refined PICOT question.
  2. Using PubMed and the Cochrane collaboration database, do a systematic review of your clinical question.
  3. Describe your systematic review and include an errors analysis.
  4. Determine an evidence-based quantitative article from the search that contains an evidence-based randomized control trial.
  5. Summarize the case study selected.
  6. Describe the study approach, sample size, and population studied.
  7. Apply the evidence from this review to your practice specifically in your overview.
  8. Evaluate the outcomes, identifying the validity and reliability.
  9. Discuss if the study contained any bias.
  10. Determine the level of evidence identified in the review.
  11. The length should be no less than 10 Pages in APA format.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements:

Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary;
  • utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; and

Your writing Assignment should:

  • follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and;
  • use APA 6th edition format

Unit 5 Assignment Dropbox – Submit Assignment

Hide Submission Folder Information

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: MN504_1702C_-3


Criteria
The student provided a comprehensive Review of Study without group consensus on application

The student provided a comprehensive Review of Study without group consensus on application

The student provided a vague review of study without including a group consensus or application

The student did not a review of the assigned case study or group consensus in the discussion.

The student’s poster project was not well developed, no professional poster evident

Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.

Overall Score


Learning Outcome MN504_1702C_-3
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply